lawyer

Park Jong-han

Park Jong-han

Kyun Hee University Law Department

·

Lawyer examination 5th round

Navy Headquarters Legal Affairs Office Military Prosecutor

Law Firm (Limited) Taepyeongyang Attorney

Tel

02-6959-9936

Fax

02-6959-9967

Email

jhpark@cheongchul.com

소개

소개

소개

Attorney Park Jong-han reviewed national contracts such as supply contracts and construction contracts as a military legal officer, and handled litigation cases related to national contracting law, compensation for expropriation, and construction litigation as a representative for national lawsuits. He also managed various criminal cases such as embezzlement, breach of trust, sexual assault, assault, and defamation, as well as discipline cases involving military personnel as a military prosecutor in South Korea. Furthermore, while serving as a judicial researcher at the High Military Court, he successfully performed judicial duties.

Later, at the law firm Pacific (LLC), he provided legal consulting and litigation services concerning real estate development projects and construction work undertaken by large corporations and public institutions, as well as urban development projects, reconstruction and redevelopment projects undertaken by local governments and unions, and construction projects for apartment buildings in the construction and real estate fields and various civil and criminal cases.

Currently, as a member of the law firm Cheongchul, he provides high-quality legal services in areas such as construction and real estate, corporate legal affairs, the Serious Accident Punishment Act, and general civil and criminal cases.

학력

  • Enrollment in the Army Academy

  • Department of Law, Kyung Hee University

  • Kyung Hee University School of Law (5th Class)

경력

  • 5th Bar Examination

  • Former Marine Corps 9th Brigade Legal Officer/Military Prosecutor

  • Former Legal Officer of the Republic of Korea Navy Headquarters

  • Former Research Officer of the High Military Court

  • Former Attorney at the Law Firm (Limited) Pacific

  • Current Attorney at the Law Firm Cheongchul

Case

Case

Case

Construction & Real Estate

[민사소송] 지역주택조합 탈퇴에 따른 분담금 반환 청구 소송 전부 승소

2025. 2. 19.

Construction & Real Estate

[민사소송] 지역주택조합 탈퇴에 따른 분담금 반환 청구 소송 전부 승소

2025. 2. 19.

Construction & Real Estate

[민사소송] 지역주택조합 탈퇴에 따른 분담금 반환 청구 소송 전부 승소

2025. 2. 19.

Construction & Real Estate

[자문] 공공기관의 신탁부동산 매수를 위한 부동산 실사 및 수의계약 체결 자문

2025. 1. 21.

Construction & Real Estate

[자문] 공공기관의 신탁부동산 매수를 위한 부동산 실사 및 수의계약 체결 자문

2025. 1. 21.

Construction & Real Estate

[자문] 공공기관의 신탁부동산 매수를 위한 부동산 실사 및 수의계약 체결 자문

2025. 1. 21.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

Construction & Real Estate

[형사소송] 근로기준법위반 피고인 조력하여 공소기각판결

2024. 12. 30.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

Construction & Real Estate

[형사소송] 근로기준법위반 피고인 조력하여 공소기각판결

2024. 12. 30.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

Construction & Real Estate

[형사소송] 근로기준법위반 피고인 조력하여 공소기각판결

2024. 12. 30.

Construction & Real Estate

[민사소송] 건축주의 시공사에 대한 공사대금반환 및 손해배상 청구 소송 전부승소

2024. 12. 30.

Construction & Real Estate

[민사소송] 건축주의 시공사에 대한 공사대금반환 및 손해배상 청구 소송 전부승소

2024. 12. 30.

Construction & Real Estate

[민사소송] 건축주의 시공사에 대한 공사대금반환 및 손해배상 청구 소송 전부승소

2024. 12. 30.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

[민사가압류] 채무자의 제3채무자에 대한 물품대금 채권가압류 인용 결정

2024. 12. 24.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

[민사가압류] 채무자의 제3채무자에 대한 물품대금 채권가압류 인용 결정

2024. 12. 24.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

[민사가압류] 채무자의 제3채무자에 대한 물품대금 채권가압류 인용 결정

2024. 12. 24.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

[소송] 골프장 회원보증금과 관련하여 관광진흥법상 회원의 이의권을 인정하는 새로운 대법원 판례를 이끌어 상고심 전부승소

2024. 12. 4.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

[소송] 골프장 회원보증금과 관련하여 관광진흥법상 회원의 이의권을 인정하는 새로운 대법원 판례를 이끌어 상고심 전부승소

2024. 12. 4.

Corporate Advisory and Dispute

[소송] 골프장 회원보증금과 관련하여 관광진흥법상 회원의 이의권을 인정하는 새로운 대법원 판례를 이끌어 상고심 전부승소

2024. 12. 4.

칼럼

칼럼

칼럼

Construction & Real Estate

[National Contract, Construction Lawyer] Whether the delay penalty agreement applies when terminating the construction contract

Hello, this is Attorney Park Jong-han from Cheongchul Law Firm.

In construction subcontracting contracts, it is common to have an agreement on delay damages. However, when a construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the rescission of the contract means that the effects of the validly formed contract are retroactively extinguished, resulting in a state as if the contract had never existed from the beginning. Therefore, it might be a concern whether the agreement on delay damages is also retroactively extinguished.

Thus, when a construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, it is necessary to examine whether the validity of the agreement on delay damages is also lost in accordance with the rescission of the contract or whether the validity of the agreement on delay damages continues despite the rescission of the contract.

[Question] - Applicability of the agreement on delay damages upon rescission of the construction subcontracting contract

[Answer] - Even if the construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the agreement on delay damages continues to apply, but the timing and duration of the delay damages are limited from the point when the contractual party could have rescinded the contract to the point when the ordering agency could have commissioned another contractor to complete the work.

The construction contract for building new buildings is a contract aimed at the completion of work known as the completion of the building, and the agreement on delay damages is a predetermined amount of damages for the delay in completing such work. Therefore, unless there are special circumstances, the contractor is obliged to pay delay damages if they do not complete the work and deliver it to the client within the agreed period.

However, in the aforementioned case, the timing of delay damages is to be limited, in the absence of special circumstances, to the agreed completion date or the end date. This cannot be said to continue indefinitely until the contractor or client completes the building; rather, it should be limited to the point when the contractor could have rescinded the contract due to the contractor's suspension of work or other reasons for rescission (not necessarily the point of actual rescission) until the point when the client could have commissioned another contractor to complete the same building. Additionally, if the work is delayed for reasons for which the contractor is not responsible, that period should be deducted from the total. If the amount of calculated delay damages is deemed excessively high, the court may reasonably reduce it under Article 398, Paragraph 2 of the Civil Act (refer to Supreme Court ruling 1989. 7. 25, cases 88DaKa6273, 88DaKa6280).

In other words, even if the construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the delay damages agreement continues to apply, but the timing and duration of the delay damages are limited from the point when the contractual party could have rescinded the contract up to the point when the ordering agency could have commissioned another contractor to complete the work.

This has briefly examined the applicability of the agreement on delay damages upon the rescission of the construction subcontracting contract. In disputes related to national contracts and public procurement, the relevant laws are very complex and often amended, so it is necessary to have knowledge and experience in this regard. It is essential to be well-versed not only in court rulings but also in the administrative agency's interpretations and cases of disposition. Therefore, I recommend seeking assistance from Attorney Park Jong-han, who has expertise in national contract laws and experience in resolving various disputes related to national contracts and procurement.

Cheongchul Law Firm consists solely of attorneys from the nation's top five law firms, including Kim & Chang, Gwangjang, Taepyungyang, Sejong, and Yulchon, as well as legal teams from large corporations. Instead of just one attorney, specialized attorneys in related fields form a team to respond. Cheongchul provides comprehensive solutions that go beyond simply resolving specific issues, focusing ultimately on achieving what the client desires. If you need assistance in achieving your goals, please do not hesitate to contact Cheongchul.

2025. 5. 13.

Construction & Real Estate

[National Contract, Construction Lawyer] Whether the delay penalty agreement applies when terminating the construction contract

Hello, this is Attorney Park Jong-han from Cheongchul Law Firm.

In construction subcontracting contracts, it is common to have an agreement on delay damages. However, when a construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the rescission of the contract means that the effects of the validly formed contract are retroactively extinguished, resulting in a state as if the contract had never existed from the beginning. Therefore, it might be a concern whether the agreement on delay damages is also retroactively extinguished.

Thus, when a construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, it is necessary to examine whether the validity of the agreement on delay damages is also lost in accordance with the rescission of the contract or whether the validity of the agreement on delay damages continues despite the rescission of the contract.

[Question] - Applicability of the agreement on delay damages upon rescission of the construction subcontracting contract

[Answer] - Even if the construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the agreement on delay damages continues to apply, but the timing and duration of the delay damages are limited from the point when the contractual party could have rescinded the contract to the point when the ordering agency could have commissioned another contractor to complete the work.

The construction contract for building new buildings is a contract aimed at the completion of work known as the completion of the building, and the agreement on delay damages is a predetermined amount of damages for the delay in completing such work. Therefore, unless there are special circumstances, the contractor is obliged to pay delay damages if they do not complete the work and deliver it to the client within the agreed period.

However, in the aforementioned case, the timing of delay damages is to be limited, in the absence of special circumstances, to the agreed completion date or the end date. This cannot be said to continue indefinitely until the contractor or client completes the building; rather, it should be limited to the point when the contractor could have rescinded the contract due to the contractor's suspension of work or other reasons for rescission (not necessarily the point of actual rescission) until the point when the client could have commissioned another contractor to complete the same building. Additionally, if the work is delayed for reasons for which the contractor is not responsible, that period should be deducted from the total. If the amount of calculated delay damages is deemed excessively high, the court may reasonably reduce it under Article 398, Paragraph 2 of the Civil Act (refer to Supreme Court ruling 1989. 7. 25, cases 88DaKa6273, 88DaKa6280).

In other words, even if the construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the delay damages agreement continues to apply, but the timing and duration of the delay damages are limited from the point when the contractual party could have rescinded the contract up to the point when the ordering agency could have commissioned another contractor to complete the work.

This has briefly examined the applicability of the agreement on delay damages upon the rescission of the construction subcontracting contract. In disputes related to national contracts and public procurement, the relevant laws are very complex and often amended, so it is necessary to have knowledge and experience in this regard. It is essential to be well-versed not only in court rulings but also in the administrative agency's interpretations and cases of disposition. Therefore, I recommend seeking assistance from Attorney Park Jong-han, who has expertise in national contract laws and experience in resolving various disputes related to national contracts and procurement.

Cheongchul Law Firm consists solely of attorneys from the nation's top five law firms, including Kim & Chang, Gwangjang, Taepyungyang, Sejong, and Yulchon, as well as legal teams from large corporations. Instead of just one attorney, specialized attorneys in related fields form a team to respond. Cheongchul provides comprehensive solutions that go beyond simply resolving specific issues, focusing ultimately on achieving what the client desires. If you need assistance in achieving your goals, please do not hesitate to contact Cheongchul.

2025. 5. 13.

Construction & Real Estate

[National Contract, Construction Lawyer] Whether the delay penalty agreement applies when terminating the construction contract

Hello, this is Attorney Park Jong-han from Cheongchul Law Firm.

In construction subcontracting contracts, it is common to have an agreement on delay damages. However, when a construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the rescission of the contract means that the effects of the validly formed contract are retroactively extinguished, resulting in a state as if the contract had never existed from the beginning. Therefore, it might be a concern whether the agreement on delay damages is also retroactively extinguished.

Thus, when a construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, it is necessary to examine whether the validity of the agreement on delay damages is also lost in accordance with the rescission of the contract or whether the validity of the agreement on delay damages continues despite the rescission of the contract.

[Question] - Applicability of the agreement on delay damages upon rescission of the construction subcontracting contract

[Answer] - Even if the construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the agreement on delay damages continues to apply, but the timing and duration of the delay damages are limited from the point when the contractual party could have rescinded the contract to the point when the ordering agency could have commissioned another contractor to complete the work.

The construction contract for building new buildings is a contract aimed at the completion of work known as the completion of the building, and the agreement on delay damages is a predetermined amount of damages for the delay in completing such work. Therefore, unless there are special circumstances, the contractor is obliged to pay delay damages if they do not complete the work and deliver it to the client within the agreed period.

However, in the aforementioned case, the timing of delay damages is to be limited, in the absence of special circumstances, to the agreed completion date or the end date. This cannot be said to continue indefinitely until the contractor or client completes the building; rather, it should be limited to the point when the contractor could have rescinded the contract due to the contractor's suspension of work or other reasons for rescission (not necessarily the point of actual rescission) until the point when the client could have commissioned another contractor to complete the same building. Additionally, if the work is delayed for reasons for which the contractor is not responsible, that period should be deducted from the total. If the amount of calculated delay damages is deemed excessively high, the court may reasonably reduce it under Article 398, Paragraph 2 of the Civil Act (refer to Supreme Court ruling 1989. 7. 25, cases 88DaKa6273, 88DaKa6280).

In other words, even if the construction subcontracting contract is rescinded, the delay damages agreement continues to apply, but the timing and duration of the delay damages are limited from the point when the contractual party could have rescinded the contract up to the point when the ordering agency could have commissioned another contractor to complete the work.

This has briefly examined the applicability of the agreement on delay damages upon the rescission of the construction subcontracting contract. In disputes related to national contracts and public procurement, the relevant laws are very complex and often amended, so it is necessary to have knowledge and experience in this regard. It is essential to be well-versed not only in court rulings but also in the administrative agency's interpretations and cases of disposition. Therefore, I recommend seeking assistance from Attorney Park Jong-han, who has expertise in national contract laws and experience in resolving various disputes related to national contracts and procurement.

Cheongchul Law Firm consists solely of attorneys from the nation's top five law firms, including Kim & Chang, Gwangjang, Taepyungyang, Sejong, and Yulchon, as well as legal teams from large corporations. Instead of just one attorney, specialized attorneys in related fields form a team to respond. Cheongchul provides comprehensive solutions that go beyond simply resolving specific issues, focusing ultimately on achieving what the client desires. If you need assistance in achieving your goals, please do not hesitate to contact Cheongchul.

2025. 5. 13.

학력

학력

학력

  • Enrollment in the Army Academy

  • Department of Law, Kyung Hee University

  • Kyung Hee University School of Law (5th Class)

경력

경력

경력

  • 5th Bar Examination

  • Former Marine Corps 9th Brigade Legal Officer/Military Prosecutor

  • Former Legal Officer of the Republic of Korea Navy Headquarters

  • Former Research Officer of the High Military Court

  • Former Attorney at the Law Firm (Limited) Pacific

  • Current Attorney at the Law Firm Cheongchul

서울 강남구 테헤란로 403 리치타워 7층

Tel. 02-6959-9936

Fax. 02-6959-9967

cheongchul@cheongchul.com

개인정보처리방침

면책공고

© 2025. Cheongchul. All rights reserved

서울 강남구 테헤란로 403 리치타워 7층

Tel. 02-6959-9936

Fax. 02-6959-9967

cheongchul@cheongchul.com

개인정보처리방침

면책공고

© 2025. Cheongchul. All rights reserved

서울 강남구 테헤란로 403 리치타워 7층

Tel. 02-6959-9936

Fax. 02-6959-9967

cheongchul@cheongchul.com

개인정보처리방침

면책공고

© 2025. Cheongchul. All rights reserved